I’m halfway through reading Nick Cutter’s The Deep, having heard a feverishly enthusiastic endorsement of it by a local radio commentator. For the most part I can’t argue with his opinion — the book has all the right stuff for a can’t-put-it-down horror/thriller: a research station at the bottom of the Mariana Trench, a mad scientist and a crazed one, a lurking evil, and a couple of people who descend from the surface to find out what’s going on. And some experimental subjects — specifically two dogs.
So far, I’ve met only one of the dogs — a skinny, anxious chocolate Lab. Don’t know what’s happened to the other one, but I’ll bet it’s something bad. And I have a bad feeling about the ultimate fate of both dogs and all the humans. This can’t end well. It’s that kind of book.
Here’s the thing: suspecting a bad end for those dogs gets in the way of enjoying the story. I’m fine with the scientists going crazy, with the humans encountering everything from claustrophobia to terrors behind closed hatches to depth-induced nightmares. That’s the whole point of reading a book like this — experiencing terrible things vicariously while reclining on your couch with your favourite cat and a bag of snacks. But expecting to share the experience of an already frightened dog suffering and dying is too real to be enjoyable. When I get to that part, I will skip over it, or just close the book and put it down.
Weird, isn’t it? In a world where millions of factory-farmed animals die every day, where small children endure terrible conditions in refugee camps, I can’t bear to read about the suffering of fictitious dogs (or, even worse, cats). Maybe it’s because I’ve witnessed the illness and deaths of three cats in the past 20 years. Maybe because unlike humans, animals don’t have any concept of hope for the future or self-sacrifice for a good cause. They are simply swept up in humanity’s projects and become unheeded debris along the road to… whatever. (But then, so are those kids in the refugee camps).
Conclusion? Horrors are great to read about, as long as they aren’t too real. As long as reading about them doesn’t bring us to a place where we don’t want to be, reminding us of the sadness and tragedy inherent in our mortal lives. Which is why many readers simply avoid the horror genre altogether, and some of us read it with relish only if we know no animals will be harmed in making the mind-movie.
I feel the same way! It’s weird isn’t it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It could be because if you really engage with a work of fiction, it becomes a kind of lived reality. Then your own personal experiences contribute to the effect. So anyone who has had a pet can’t bear to “experience” that, even vicariously.
Thanks for your comment!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think that we can handle bad things happening to adult characters because they usually have at least some control over the situation that they’re in, or have got themselves into the predicament. Animals that we love and care for strike a different cord. They are totally innocent and dependent on us for protection. Someone intentionally putting them in danger, or using them strikes too close for comfort.
Yes, exactly! This shows that we don’t really want the fiction we read to be realistic — not uniformly anyway. Approximating reality and making it better is good, but if there’s too much real-life pain and suffering, many of us stop reading (or watching, in the case of movies). Thanks for reading and commenting.
Comments are closed.