Now that spring is imminent, perennials are poking their noses above the ground, telling gardeners that they are alive and ready for another growing season. Gardeners hover anxiously over spots where particularly fussy or cold-intolerant specimens were last seen, hoping for a sign of life.
I’ve been hovering over my blue poppies. Late last summer, I transplanted them to what I thought were deluxe accommodations in half-barrels. Excellent soil, no tree roots, and a pea gravel mulch intended to prevent crown rot. Custom made roofs on legs to keep away winter rain. No efforts were spared. The plants settled in nicely and made new growth before they went dormant for winter. So far this spring, things don’t look good. I’m beginning to think the pea gravel was a mistake; it probably kept the top layer of soil moist enough for the dreaded crown rot to do its thing. If all seven plants are dead, I’ll have to acquire new ones and try again.
The white and yellow daffodil in the featured image has bloomed faithfully each spring since the mid 1990s. At first there was only one flower; a few years later, there were two, and the past two or three springs, it’s produced three flowers. So what? Daffodils are planted out by the thousands in parks and even in some private gardens. But this one plant is easily identifiable, and so regular, that I have come to recognize it as an individual.
This picture — of a gardener fussing over a few plants, or even a single one — is completely removed from the way plants are sold and handled on a commercial scale. We’ve all seen hundreds of potted plants for sale, not at nurseries or even garden centres, but at grocery stores, hardware stores, and discount consumer outlets. No one fusses over these units produced by mass propagation. They’re given minimal attention by busy staff, wheeled in and out of display areas daily, get knocked over by windstorms, and finally start to look a bit stressed. Plants that don’t sell by the end of July are put on deep discount and finally trashed. At least they’re compostable.
Then there are instant gardens installed by landscape contractors driving trucks with graphically designed logos on the doors. In a week, the job is done. A multitude of perennials and shrubs has been plugged into the ground in pleasing patterns. The operation has more in common with laying carpets or interlocking bricks than with my kind of gardening. Freshly finished, such gardens look lovely and (on a bad day) make me think mine — the result of a quarter century of earnest digging, planting, watering, and anxious hovering — looks pathetic by comparison. Of course, if not maintained by someone who knows what they’re doing, those installed gardens go downhill pretty fast. I’ve seen it happen.
Those who do large scale garden work seem to have a utilitarian or even disrespectful attitude toward plants. Often, it starts with razing and removal of every growing thing on a city lot — and of the original house too — followed by digging a great big hole, maybe a bit of blasting. A huge house is erected and landscaping installed by a contractor. Another contractor provides an irrigation system, probably programmed and controlled with a smartphone app. A truck pulls up once a week, disgorging fast-moving people wielding power tools who buzz through the place, mowing, trimming, fluffing up the soil and adding mulch. As long as the bills are paid, the place looks fine. In such gardens, you don’t see any shabbily-dressed figures (i.e., resident gardeners) drifting around, peering at plants and scuffling inefficiently, making repeated trips to the shed for yet another tool, a couple more stakes, or a ball of twine.
I want to say that the instant garden isn’t really a garden, and those yard maintenance folks aren’t gardeners. I suspect this idea may be tainted with irrational sentimentality, but I’m clinging to it anyway. To me a garden is a patch of earth sweated over by someone who knows almost every plant that grows from it, who rejoices when those first shoots appear in spring and mourns when they don’t.
I suppose what I’m really talking about is analogous to the difference between the backyard chicken flock where every hen has a name, and the industrial poultry system. The small, personal garden and the installed landscape are really two different (if related) things. Each has a place, but in me they evoke opposite reactions.
Well said! There’s a house two corners from us that is built around the trees instead of the trees planted around the house. Big difference. It’s my favorite yard in the neighborhood.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I often complain about my trees (roots and shade making it hard to grow stuff near them), but a treeless neighbourhood seems bleak.
LikeLike
Your analogy is spot on between a home gardener or chicken flock owner and industrial agra-business. Have you read Animal, Vegetable, Miracle by Barbara Kingsolver? She addresses those issues in her book about a year of living/dining locally on vegetables/fruits/meats that they have either grown themselves or bartered with other local farmers to acquire.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Anything you do yourself and put your heart into is going to be more meaningful than something you pay someone else to do and maintain for you. Insta-gardens are not going to have the quirkiness or individuality of something that the owner planted over time (or even planned themselves).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes! A real garden shows the interaction of the gardener with the prevailing conditions over time, complete with imperfections. Things never turn out as planned, but in the end that’s all right.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sounds like an interesting book. I’ll look it up. Thanks for the recommendation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We have several plots of daffodils and keep an eye on them with anticipation each spring.
LikeLiked by 2 people
One does get to know what blooms when, and to look forward to each emergence.
LikeLike
I had a beautiful garden when I moved into this house. Built by someone else, maintained by someone else, and way above my pay scale. It’s only in the last year that I really took to heart the idea that I could make a garden that spoke to me with some effort. I could buy the plants that appealed to me, even if it didn’t fit the garden esthetic someone else designed. It’s such a slow learning curve, but a fun one, with tangible results.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve found that myself through gardening for several decades — in the end it’s worthwhile, even if you don’t achieve a picture-perfect garden.
LikeLike
A blue poppy! How wondrous! … those kinds of gardens that are ‘maintained by’, really don’t appeal to me as a garden. They are too, industrialised and most of ’em don’t seem to have a soul, even though they may look ‘pretty’. Give me mulch and compost and scruffy and bits of string and twigs, any day. 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly! And blue poppies are wondrous, which is why I’m not giving up on growing them.
LikeLiked by 1 person